Dorchester Progressive Democrats: Proudly PDA!

Comments and Articles

Home
ACTION ALERT
Mission Statement
Calendar
Endorsements
Healthcare Reform
TAKE ACTION! PDA in the News
South Carolina Hall of Shame!
Activities
Healthcare Stories
Videos
Fun stuff
Important links
Comments and Articles
PDA-South Carolina

labbe.jpg

If you would like your comment posted...please fill out the form below.

Full name:
Email address:
Comment:
  

Obama upstaged by a blast heard around the nation

and other articles

by Carol Bailey-Lloyd

click here to view or download Carol's articles

The New Confederacy of Republicans

Open Letter to the President

Petition in Support of Nobel Peace Prize for President Obama

What Is a Legacy Worth?


As the discussion of Healthcare reform moves through the United States Senate one hears the word filibuster being tossed about with reckless abandon. Members of the media reference it as a Republican strategic move designed to defeat current legislation under consideration. Political figures from both parties threatened to lead a filibuster in opposition to any reform measures with which they disapprove. This sets the stage for quite a titanic battle on the floor of the Senate. It's the "stuff" from which great movies are created. Picture members of the Senate standing alone in opposition to legislation that threatens the very foundations of the Republic. Before we begin writing the script perhaps we would be wise to review the word's meaning and purpose within our democracy.

The term filibuster is derived from the Spanish word filibustero, literally translated as pirate or freebooter. It is a military term that is applied to a legislative action designed to obstruct or highjack debate. As a pirate takes but offers nothing, a filibuster is a negative response without providing a positive solution. When the Founding Fathers established our present form of government, with it's checks and balance system, they incorporated the ability to filibuster as a last resort to protect the constitutional rights of a minority from being abused. This unique legislative action was vested in the Senate because they envisioned that body taking a more nationalistic approach to issues. They assumed that the members of the House of Representatives would be swayed by local concerns due to  the frequency in which they face the voters. With Senators serving extended terms they should be less likely to bend to public pressures. This would result in their using this power judiciously, refraining from obstructing the clear will of the majority without sound cause. They would only employ such a tactic in the most dire of circumstances involving constitutional considerations.

This procedure has been employed sparingly but usually under circumstances that do not meet those high standards. The most infamous listings include Sen. Strom Thurmond's 24 hour filibuster against Civil Right's Legislation in 1957 and conservative opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In both situations those utilizing this tactic are seen in hindsight to be obstructing the march of history. "Google" Strom Thurmond and two facts highlighted are his leadership of the Dixiecrats in 1948 and filibustering of equal rights in 1957. That he turned constituency service into an art form provided regardless of one's political affiliation and his being the first member of Congress from the old Confederacy to employ African- Americans on his staff are never mentioned. The ability to establish longstanding working relationship's with members of the other party, as illustrated when Vice-President Biden offered a heartfelt eulogy at his funeral, will not be remembered either. His historical legacy is established primarily by these acts of defiance aimed against providing long overdue equal constitutional rights. His longevity and this futile attempt to forestall the sweep of history by use of a parliamentary procedure frame his accomplishments. 

Those who support healthcare reform welcome a robust debate in the Senate. Discussion of the merits of this pending legislation will without question strengthen the final document. Senators should approach this debate considering the legitimate pro's and con's so that the resulting bill better serve's the common good. In doing so their efforts will further our national dialogue regardless of the outcome of the vote. They should express their concerns with passion but offer meaningful ideas for improvement. However once they have made their case no one should resort to delaying tactics to obstruct a final vote. Citizens rightfully expect their national leaders to address healthcare needs and demand responsible actions which moves towards resolution of this crisis. The American people have indicated in numerous polls that they desire results They want government to work not repeat the inaction experienced over the last 100 years. They realize failure comes at their expense and cannot afford to continue waiting while political leaders grandstand. In the end this legislation should be given an up or down vote, not stalled or delayed in a manner which is reminiscent of tactics used to stopgate civil rights for generations. Each Senator will have an opportunity to cast that vote. Afterwards they will return home and defend their decision to the electorate.

Hopefully Senators will weigh the consequences of their words and deeds during debate. Most assuredly members will be held accountable for them, if not in the next election cycle, then as those actions become part of their legacy. What a terrible price, being defined as obstructing instead of working towards a meaningful solution to one of the most pressing issues facing this nation. A legacy that I suspect no one in public service would strive to achieve.
  
John G. Painter, Chair
Pickens County Democratic Party

The Choice is clear:

Robert Burton Loves War, Robert Dobbs Loves Peace and Security!

Recently, Robert Burton, came out strongly attacking Robert Dobbs on his stance on ending the unnecessary wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Burton is for continuing a policy of draining the American economy fighting two no win wars, when as Robert Dobbs pointed out in a recent debate that the TRILLIONS could be better spent at home on UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE, GREEN JOB CREATION and EDUCATION. Does South Carolina need to elect Robert Burton and more of the same? It's about time we elect a true Progressive! Support Robert Dobbs for the Democratic Nomination for Congressional District 1. Go to : http://www.electdobbs.com/. The Democratic Party needs Robert! South Carolina needs Robert! America needs Robert! Let's send a true Progressive to Congress, not just more of the same!

About the 40 Million
 
Ron Brinson’s editorial commentary showed how wealthy people who can afford any amount of healthcare insurance are totally out of touch with the reality of the poor and middle class citizens of this great country. Ron writes a Pollyanna story how he loves the healthcare in America, and please don’t change it.
Ron – What about the more than 40 million people in the United States that cannot afford adequate healthcare and go without drugs, eyeglasses or dental treatment?? These US citizens, many children, d not get to enjoy the healthcare system that you do except in emergency rooms of the local public hospital – if they have one!
Even Republicans admit the present healthcare system is broken and inadequate, and that more if not all citizens need to be covered.  The Democrats at least are trying o come up with solutions!  Where is the Republican alternative?  Jim DeMint’s ideas only give more money to the pharmaceuticals and insurance companies, and do not allow citizens to sue for malpractice!  That is not going to get those 40 million citizen healthcare!!
Ron Brinson and the other wealthy Republicans are out of touch with mainstream hardworking American citizens.  They need to spend more time in the emergency rooms with citizens than out to expensive dinner or the golf course with their insurance and pharmaceutical industry buddies.
 We have a moral imperative to provide adequate healthcare for everybody – do as the Democrats have done and come up with answers!
Richard Hayes Dorchester County Democratic Party North Charleston, SC
 
 

Military Training and Joe Wilson
 
Like most everyone, my faith and life experiences serve as the compass by which I set my course through life. For me, my experience as a husband, a father, a small business owner, and public servant all contribute to the decisions I make.  But no experience has been more fundamental in the decisions I make than my experience in the United States Armed Services.  I served for 3 years, from 1986 to 1989 in the U.S. Army Airborne, attaining the rank of SGT/E-5. 
 
Military training has its basis on a few core principles; Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Courage.  The military instills these values in those of us who are lucky enough to serve, and we are beholden to represent that those values as we transition into civilian life.

Some would argue that Congressman Joe Wilson had a right to confront the President of the United States.  In the proper forum, I agree. However, in every military operation we are guided by rules of engagement; rules that help us define our mission, define when it is proper to act or react, and what amount of response is appropriate.  These rules protect the lives of our fellow soldiers, and the civilians we are bound by duty to protect.  Congressman Joe Wilson, who is a veteran, should have understood better the rules of engagement for the Presidential Address on Wednesday evening. 

There is no protocol, or excuse for heckling the President of the United States during a speech, no matter what political party that President is from. Voicing opposition at that moment, in that setting, was a violation of the rules of engagement and disrespectful towards the Office of the President of the United States.  On the field of battle, when someone violates the rules of engagement there are always consequences – many times mortal. Last Wednesday’s outburst, while not mortal in nature, did do damage. It set a standard of uncivil discourse as acceptable behavior. Behavior that is unbecoming of a veteran and a standing member of Congress.

When Congressman Wilson shouted ‘You lie!’ at President Obama, he also showed a perverse disregard for another important tenet of military training: respect for your commanding officer.  Though the President is not in charge of any Member of Congress, the President is the Commander-in-Chief and the Office of the President is due respect.  In the military, even in disagreement, we are taught to show superior officers the proper respect during formal occasions.  The President of the United States is the Commander in Chief of all our countries proud armed forces.  That title alone, demands the proper respect that is supposed to be instilled through military training.  Either Congressman Wilson never learned or purposely chose to disregard his military training.

Robert A. Dobbs Democratic Candidate  South Carolina 1st Congressional District 

 

Reform is a myth

I didn't realize that I'm a health care pioneer (Dec. 15 editorial "Solutions for health care").

All this time I thought my husband and I were just a couple of middle-class people struggling to pay health care insurance premiums that have nearly doubled in the last five years.

And aren't we smart to have a high deductible plan that keeps our monthly premium to a mere $1,800 for the two of us?

Last year our premiums and deductibles came to $23,000. In 2010, we will pay $28,000. But that's OK -- we are in the vanguard.

The premise of the editorial was ridiculous, and the condescending tone made it worse. How many people are able, when faced with the prospect of surgery, to haggle with all-powerful insurance companies? How many people have the money to lay out for a high deductible?

We did try to shop around for a more affordable plan. Our current arrangement was the best we could find. Many of the "lower cost, less comprehensive" plans cover next to nothing. One had a deductible of $15,000, but did not cover things like cancer or heart attacks. Buyer beware.

The idea that health care is a commodity like potatoes or shoes is disturbing, and all the more so as we are being urged to think of ourselves not as patients who need care, but as consumers.

After the demise of a strong public option, a glimmer of hope arose in the form of buy-ins to Medicare for people 55 and up. This, too, along with cost control of pharmaceuticals via re-importation, was extinguished.

Now we know. Reform is a myth, and no help is forthcoming. We know who to thank.

Susan Shapiro

Murray Boulevard

Summerville

Congrats to the following PDA Members who became US Citizens on January 7, 2010: Victoria Santiago Labbe, Alvizar Santiago and Sergz Santiago

walker.jpg

dpdlogo.jpg

Important Disclaimer:
We are a progressive organization affliated as a chapter of the Progressive Democrats of America . Neither this website or the Dorchester Progressive Democrats is affliliated with any county, state or national party.

logo.gif

Click here to join the Progressive Democrats of America.

Click here to start a South Carolina Chapter.

Email Chairperson of Dorchester Progressive Democrats: Patrick C. Labbe 

Email SC State Coordinator for PDA: Patrick C. Labbe

Email 1st Congressional District PDA Point Person: Harshad Vyas

Email 2nd Congressional District PDA Point Person: Rita A. Bailey

Charleston Progressive Democrats

Midlands Progressive Democrats

PDA-South Carolina